cherrypicking
Do you understand what that link is? Do you notice <= 1 on almost all, and not a single post from other users?
Use you head.
I get it, you're still angry about this. Get over it.
Edit:
Also, just look at the guys comments in this post.
He's almost as insane as you.
If we could focus on your current stupidity, and leave your past stupidity out of it for now, that would be helpful.
The posts are not scoring as well as Owlchemy's (due in part to your vindictive downvoting?). Popularity really isn't a good criteria for spam identification - unless you'd like to see Phuks devolve into an ideological echo-chamber like Voat. We should welcome unpopular content and unpopular opinions that clearly aren't commercial spam.
Don't be stupid.
It is very clear from his actions that I am correct. I don't need to convince you. Others can plainly see for themselves, and I don't care what you think.
Your white-knighting of this troll is due to your butt-hurt from past.
You have been constantly attacking me at every opportunity you find, unprovoked, teaming up with a troll is a new low for you, but not exactly new.
All your comments in thei sthread are below Zero! You are spammer! Or just a complete moron with no life and a shitty outlook.
Have you ever read ANYTHING I have posted? You don't have to answer, we know the truth.
Why are you so afraid of someone else's opinion?
The funny thing is, they all have 5-6 positive votes, but your Luddite crowd downvote them back to 1 or 2. Why is that? Are you afraid to read? Do words scare you? If I posted a cat video, will you downvote it, too?
The funny thing is, they all have 5-6 positive votes, but your Luddite crowd downvote them back to 1 or 2. Why is that? Are you afraid to read? Do words scare you? If I posted a cat video, will you downvote it, too?
I'm quoting this because you have edited and completely changed comment in the past, and I don't want this evidence of your mental instability to disappear.
You're not even a little bit grounded. Full on raving. Not the good kind with drugs, just angry foaming at the mouth kind.
No, that's what cherrypicking looks like. As I pointed out last time, it would be a moronic way to identify spammers.
You could suggest some not-completely-stupid criteria for spammer identification... On the other hand, maybe the admins are quite capable of identifying spammers without you picking on users you don't like.