4

33 comments

[–] smallpond 2 points (+3|-1)

If we could focus on your current stupidity, and leave your past stupidity out of it for now, that would be helpful.

The posts are not scoring as well as Owlchemy's (due in part to your vindictive downvoting?). Popularity really isn't a good criteria for spam identification - unless you'd like to see Phuks devolve into an ideological echo-chamber like Voat. We should welcome unpopular content and unpopular opinions that clearly aren't commercial spam.

Don't be stupid.

It is very clear from his actions that I am correct. I don't need to convince you. Others can plainly see for themselves, and I don't care what you think.
Your white-knighting of this troll is due to your butt-hurt from past.

You have been constantly attacking me at every opportunity you find, unprovoked, teaming up with a troll is a new low for you, but not exactly new.

[–] smallpond 2 points (+2|-0)

At least try to address my comment like an adult.

Unpopular content, and domains that are primarily posted by a single user aren't enough to constitute spam. If cyclops1771's content was spam the admins would have taken action by now - they're not blind.

If Counterpunch triggers you so much, downvoting and moving on would be much more dignified than this.

At least try to address my comment like an adult.

It is very clear from his actions that I am correct. I don't need to convince you. Others can plainly see for themselves, and I don't care what you think.

If Counterpunch triggers you so much, downvoting and moving on would be much more dignified than this.

More dignified than what? What do you imagine I am doing other than sharing my opinion? I made one comment with a link, and allow the reader to decide for themselves if they care or not.
Do you have a problem with that, and why should I care?

Get over your butt-hurt from the past. It is preventing you from thinking rationally. Look through this post and think again about who's the problem, and who's the provocateur.