4

33 comments

[–] InnocentBystander -1 points (+1|-2) Edited

cherrypicking

Do you understand what that link is? Do you notice <= 1 on almost all, and not a single post from other users?
Use you head.

I get it, you're still angry about this. Get over it.

Edit:

Also, just look at the guys comments in this post.
He's almost as insane as you.

[–] smallpond 2 points (+3|-1)

If we could focus on your current stupidity, and leave your past stupidity out of it for now, that would be helpful.

The posts are not scoring as well as Owlchemy's (due in part to your vindictive downvoting?). Popularity really isn't a good criteria for spam identification - unless you'd like to see Phuks devolve into an ideological echo-chamber like Voat. We should welcome unpopular content and unpopular opinions that clearly aren't commercial spam.

Don't be stupid.

It is very clear from his actions that I am correct. I don't need to convince you. Others can plainly see for themselves, and I don't care what you think.
Your white-knighting of this troll is due to your butt-hurt from past.

You have been constantly attacking me at every opportunity you find, unprovoked, teaming up with a troll is a new low for you, but not exactly new.

[–] smallpond 2 points (+2|-0)

At least try to address my comment like an adult.

Unpopular content, and domains that are primarily posted by a single user aren't enough to constitute spam. If cyclops1771's content was spam the admins would have taken action by now - they're not blind.

If Counterpunch triggers you so much, downvoting and moving on would be much more dignified than this.