From the article (which you DID NOT READ, because, you know, it has all these words, not a single cat video!!!). Tell me, which of these is a bad thing that is SO horrible the entire site must be banned from here?
TV news is not what happened. Rather, it is what someone thinks is worth reporting. While viewers are often inclined to take what is reported by television “news” hosts at face value, it is your responsibility to judge and analyze what is reported.
TV news is entertainment. There is a reason why the programs you watch are called news “shows.” It’s a signal that the so-called news is being delivered as a form of entertainment. Although the news items spoon-fed to you may have some value, they are primarily a commodity to gather an audience, which will in turn be sold to advertisers.
Never underestimate the power of commercials, especially to news audiences. In an average household, the television set is on over seven hours a day. Most people, believing themselves to be in control of their media consumption, are not really bothered by this. But TV is a two-way attack: it not only delivers programming to your home, it also delivers you (the consumer) to a sponsor.
It is vitally important to learn about the economic and political interests of those who own the “corporate” media. Even those “fake” news outlets denounced by Trump are enjoying significant sales and ratings boosts as a result of Trump’s so-called war on the media. In other words, to a dying news industry, the Trump presidency has been great for business.
Pay special attention to the language of newscasts. TV by its very nature manipulates viewers. One must never forget that every television minute has been edited.
Reduce by at least one-half the amount of TV news you watch. Do not form your concept of reality based on television.
Watching TV news gives the illusion of participation in American life. Americans should beware of letting others—whether they be television news hosts, political commentators or media corporations—do their thinking for them.
Nobody said anything about a ban, or the article.
Get a hold of your emotions, they are making you look silly.
Nobody said anything about a ban, or the article.
even when it becomes clear that it is not wanted
Respond to the article POSTED, not the site of it.
This is the same stupid ass moronic behavior - if Trump gave $1 billion of personal money and cured cancer, idiotic people would rail he didn't do it fast enough, or he didn't cure AIDS, or something else.
This type of blanket "I don't like it, therefore it's bad" behavior and mindset is the perfect example of a lack of critical thinking. Luckily, the site here is able to see you, as a perfect example, of a person unable to reconcile a place that has thoughts they like AND thoughts they don't like, and simply screed against that they don't like.
Sad, really.
Posting the same site over and over, even when it becomes clear that it is not wanted, is spam.
I am familiar with the site. It is garbage. It makes Brietbart or Huffpo look balabnced. That's probably what users don't like it.
You insult me and cry like a bitch, but I just know you're going to accuse me of being the immature one again.
Self-reflection, look it up.
Alts? You are going to accuse me of using alts? I guess that's what happens when you judge others by your own standards. You must think everyone is an angry sock-puppet.