Nobody said anything about a ban, or the article.
even when it becomes clear that it is not wanted
Respond to the article POSTED, not the site of it.
This is the same stupid ass moronic behavior - if Trump gave $1 billion of personal money and cured cancer, idiotic people would rail he didn't do it fast enough, or he didn't cure AIDS, or something else.
This type of blanket "I don't like it, therefore it's bad" behavior and mindset is the perfect example of a lack of critical thinking. Luckily, the site here is able to see you, as a perfect example, of a person unable to reconcile a place that has thoughts they like AND thoughts they don't like, and simply screed against that they don't like.
Sad, really.
Take your meds.
You're not even coherent, again.
What I said was :
This is what a spammer looks like
Your gibberish above is entertaining, but it doesn't have any connection to anything I've said.
So, your argument is "Blame the messenger"?
Brilliant philosophy!
Nobody said anything about a ban, or the article.
Get a hold of your emotions, they are making you look silly.