Except that I did argue the content:
How about instead of attacking the page, you read it and see that it's a sourced article.
It's telling how you left that part out. I pointed out your hypocrisy as an addition, not a substitution.
Except that I did argue the content:
> How about instead of attacking the page, you read it and see that it's a sourced article.
It's telling how you left that part out. I pointed out your hypocrisy as an addition, not a substitution.
.