How about instead of attacking the page, you read it and see that it's a sourced article.
It's telling how you left that part out. I pointed out your hypocrisy as an addition, not a substitution.
Except that I did argue the content:
> How about instead of attacking the page, you read it and see that it's a sourced article.
It's telling how you left that part out. I pointed out your hypocrisy as an addition, not a substitution.
No memes or images. Exceptions may be made in the case of images of an ongoing news story becoming available.
User-edited titles are not allowed. Copy the headline directly and use it as the post title. Corrections in spelling or minor alterations may be acceptable.
News articles written over a month before posting must have the date of the article in the post title.
No paywalls. Use an archived link to post a paywalled article.
Except that I did argue the content:
It's telling how you left that part out. I pointed out your hypocrisy as an addition, not a substitution.