Says the guy who loves The Guardian.
How about instead of attacking the page, you read it and see that it's a sourced article.
Or is that your problem? You can't argue the content, so you try to shift attention to the source.
Says the guy who loves The Guardian.
How about instead of attacking the page, you read it and see that it's a sourced article.
Or is that your problem? You can't argue the content, so you try to shift attention to the source.
Except that I did argue the content:
How about instead of attacking the page, you read it and see that it's a sourced article.
It's telling how you left that part out. I pointed out your hypocrisy as an addition, not a substitution.
Except that I did argue the content:
> How about instead of attacking the page, you read it and see that it's a sourced article.
It's telling how you left that part out. I pointed out your hypocrisy as an addition, not a substitution.
Mumsnet forums, Really?