Yeah you specifically adressed all those cases or any similar ones in your original comment............
Are you getting upset?
Sure, that has similarities and was the Russians, but they wanted to send a clear message, and did so in a way that got the desired results, with no fallout for them. I don't see any need for them to make a display of what is already well established. At this time, with political tensions that exist, I think it would have far more impact on foreign governments than local agents. I don't see this as lining up with Russias current goal of stabilizing their position.
I think you understand what I was trying to say, but I'll simplify even more:
The Russians gained from your examples, but loses from this one. There has so far been zero evidence to back the accusations.
I am not so much asserting what has or has not happened. I am saying you don't have a clue, and you're a moron if you take Theresas word for it.
If you feel the need to continue twisting my comments out of context, go ahead, but I'm going to put away my 'discussion hat' and put on the 'prick suit' if that's the game you want to play.
Like in John Grisham spynovels
Don't be a bitch. Resorting to a faulty comparison is an appeal to emotional effect and a very low-brow argumentative style. You didn't actually dispute my point. Just tried to equate it with a novel.
You're better than this.
Are you getting upset?
Just annoyed at your condescending thone
If you feel the need to continue twisting my comments out of context, go ahead, but I'm going to put away my 'discussion hat' and put on the 'prick suit' if that's the game you want to play.
Seriously who the fuck is actually twisting what here? ..... you merely just keep projecting your thoughts in these comments and seemingly getting more frustrated at whomever .....
Like in John Grisham spynovels
Don't be a bitch. Resorting to a faulty comparison is an appeal to emotional effect and a very low-brow argumentative style. You didn't actually dispute my point. Just tried to equate it with a novel. You're better than this.
So; No you have no reference about how KGB (FSB currently btw) actually operates or what their agenda is... and there is that thone again added with namecalling and some frustrated hoompapa....
You're better then this.... sad trombone for you...
Just annoyed at your condescending thone
The tone you imagine is in your head.
Seriously who the fuck is actually twisting what here?
You are.
You listed a bunch of assassination attempts, as if I had ever said anything different, as if they had some relevance to the point I was making. That's twisting.
I say it looks fishy, like something someone would do to frame the Russians. You respond by showing how it could look like the Russians. Seriously?
Also: "Resorting to a faulty comparison is an appeal to emotional effect and a very low-brow argumentative style. You didn't actually dispute my point. Just tried to equate it with a novel."
So; No you have no ...
Yes. I do.
you merely just keep projecting your thoughts in these comments and seemingly getting more frustrated at whomever
What are you talking about? I'm interested to know where you think I am projecting my thoughts.
At what point do you see any unprovoked hostility from me?
Are you claiming that you are not being hostile?
Are you going to claim that your first reply to me was an honest and sincere attempt at discussion, that you really didn't understand what "Maybe I'm wrong, I'm mostly speculating, but it really doesn't make sense.", means? Or maybe you got confused and thought I was saying the Russians wouldn't assassinate someone? Because it sure looks like you were out to pick a fight.
and there is that thone again added with namecalling and some frustrated hoompapa....
Name-calling.. that's what you take from it? Technically true if a bit of a stretch, but clearly not the point. Frustrated, yes, that's the one part you've got correct. I am frustrated and disappointed. I know that something pissed you off a while back, I hoped you'd get over it. I miss the Boukert that enjoyed discussion and avoided flames.
Do you think that I am the one that took this from discussion to mud-slinging? This is all on you.
You reap what you sow.
https://media0.giphy.com/media/l4FGr3nzq5u0m02vm/giphy.gif
Yeah you specifically adressed all those cases or any similar ones in your original comment............
Like in John Grisham spynovels?? wth are you using for reference?