Britain expels 23 Russian diplomats over chemical attack on ex-spy

> Just annoyed at your condescending thone The tone you imagine is in your head. > Seriously who the fuck is actually twisting what here? You are. You listed a bunch of assassination attempts, as if I had ever said anything different, as if they had some relevance to the point I was making. That's twisting. I say it looks fishy, like something someone would do to frame the Russians. You respond by showing how it could look like the Russians. Seriously? Also: "Resorting to a faulty comparison is an appeal to emotional effect and a very low-brow argumentative style. You didn't actually dispute my point. Just tried to equate it with a novel." > So; No you have no ... Yes. I do. > you merely just keep projecting your thoughts in these comments and seemingly getting more frustrated at whomever What are you talking about? I'm interested to know where you think I am projecting my thoughts. At what point do you see any unprovoked hostility from me? Are you claiming that you are not being hostile? Are you going to claim that your first reply to me was an honest and sincere attempt at discussion, that you really didn't understand what "Maybe I'm wrong, I'm mostly speculating, but it really doesn't make sense.", means? Or maybe you got confused and thought I was saying the Russians wouldn't assassinate someone? Because it sure looks like you were out to pick a fight. > and there is that thone again added with namecalling and some frustrated hoompapa.... Name-calling.. that's what you take from it? Technically true if a bit of a stretch, but clearly not the point. Frustrated, yes, that's the one part you've got correct. I am frustrated and disappointed. I know that something pissed you off a while back, I hoped you'd get over it. I miss the Boukert that enjoyed discussion and avoided flames. Do you think that **I** am the one that took this from discussion to mud-slinging? This is all on you. You reap what you sow.