10

10 comments

[–] Boukert [OP] 0 points (+0|-0)

Did 5 min of homework

And yet you missed that I already addressed that:
" Before someone says what about the guy they microwaved?(or any of your examples) Sure, that has similarities and was the Russians, but they wanted to send a clear message, and did so in a way that got the desired results, with no fallout for them."

And elaborated my intended point in another comment with:
"I don't see any need for them to make a display of what is already well established. At this time, with political tensions that exist, I think it would have far more impact on foreign governments than local agents. I don't see this as lining up with Russias current goal of stabilizing their position."

The point is this looks like what someone would do to try and look like the Russians. But it lacks the nuance and motives that are typically found in KGB actions.

[–] Boukert [OP] 0 points (+0|-0)

And yet you missed that I already addressed that:

https://media0.giphy.com/media/l4FGr3nzq5u0m02vm/giphy.gif

(or any of your examples)

Yeah you specifically adressed all those cases or any similar ones in your original comment............

But it lacks the nuance and motives that are typically found in KGB actions.

Like in John Grisham spynovels?? wth are you using for reference?

Yeah you specifically adressed all those cases or any similar ones in your original comment............

Are you getting upset?

Sure, that has similarities and was the Russians, but they wanted to send a clear message, and did so in a way that got the desired results, with no fallout for them. I don't see any need for them to make a display of what is already well established. At this time, with political tensions that exist, I think it would have far more impact on foreign governments than local agents. I don't see this as lining up with Russias current goal of stabilizing their position.

I think you understand what I was trying to say, but I'll simplify even more:
The Russians gained from your examples, but loses from this one. There has so far been zero evidence to back the accusations.
I am not so much asserting what has or has not happened. I am saying you don't have a clue, and you're a moron if you take Theresas word for it.

If you feel the need to continue twisting my comments out of context, go ahead, but I'm going to put away my 'discussion hat' and put on the 'prick suit' if that's the game you want to play.

Like in John Grisham spynovels

Don't be a bitch. Resorting to a faulty comparison is an appeal to emotional effect and a very low-brow argumentative style. You didn't actually dispute my point. Just tried to equate it with a novel.
You're better than this.