1

For instance, click rates show that my sub is overwhelmingly popular with the general Phuks crowd – yet no one actually subscribes! =/

I understand. Obviously, this is due to cancel-culture peer pressure taking its toll. That, and of course also because our fans
especially those who come for their daily hateb0ner… ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
don’t have to subscribe, as via /all/new, they get all the good stuff without any commitment anyway!

I believe it is really a matter of fairness that the subs one enjoys in one’s feed, one also gets to be subscribed to. This could even be an automated process.

Then add a sitewide random sticky to the top of /all/new – to keep things nice’n’agitated.

Bᴀʀʀᴀɢᴇ ᴏғ ɴᴇᴏᴘʜᴏʙɪᴄ ʀᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟɪᴢᴀᴛɪᴏɴs ᴀs ᴛᴏ ᴡʜʏ ᴡᴇ ᴄᴀɴ’ᴛ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ɴɪᴄᴇ ᴛʜɪɴɢs ɪɴ 3, 2, 1, …

For instance, click rates show that *my* sub is ***overwhelmingly popular*** with the general Phuks crowd – yet **no one** actually subscribes! =/ I understand. Obviously, this is due to cancel-culture peer pressure taking its toll. That, and of course also because ***our fans*** – >! especially those who come for their daily hateb0ner… ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)!< – ***don’t have to*** subscribe, as via /all/new, they get all the good stuff without any commitment anyway! I believe it is really a matter of fairness that the subs one enjoys in one’s feed, one also gets to be subscribed to. This could even be an automated process. Then add a sitewide random sticky to the top of /all/new – to keep things nice’n’agitated. ***Bᴀʀʀᴀɢᴇ ᴏғ ɴᴇᴏᴘʜᴏʙɪᴄ ʀᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟɪᴢᴀᴛɪᴏɴs ᴀs ᴛᴏ ᴡʜʏ ᴡᴇ ᴄᴀɴ’ᴛ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ɴɪᴄᴇ ᴛʜɪɴɢs ɪɴ 3, 2, 1, …***

17 comments

[–] Loki88 -2 points (+1|-3)

The "block sub" button is part of the problem.

It allows to create a custom feed not based on the subs that you subscribe to (i.e., the way things are supposed to be)... but on what subs you block.

If this was fully intentional, then with the only aim to foster & protect a discriminatory cancel mentality, i.e., to "keep the plebs in check." A kind of unfortunately entitled, circle-jerking elitism that I have had to notice here before...

[–] Butler_crosley 1 points (+2|-1) Edited

I use the block sub feature to keep some subs out of my feed because I'm not interested in reading those posts. The other subs I don't mind seeing since there is little activity in the subs I've subscribed to. I like this way better.

[–] [Deleted] 1 points (+3|-2)

Heaven forbid you disagree with them! They think that free speech means that you are obligated to listen to whatever they babble about.

[–] Loki88 -1 points (+1|-2)

Heaven forbid you ask them what their actual stance is and engage in discussion with them instead of contenting yourself in snarking out made-up, conveniently bogus strawman arguments.

Aren't you the one who didn't even deny or protest when she was compared to Hillary Clinton and her "deplorables" shtick?

How unfortunately typical.

[–] 16Mega [OP] -1 points (+1|-2)

You do realize that a subscription-based feed also won't contain my or anyone else's sub... unless you subscribe to it.

Oh wait.

You don't.

[–] Loki88 -1 points (+1|-2)

Yeah, you "like this way better"... because you're a tad lazy and do not like to commit to anything as long as you can get around it, right?

Phuks shouldn't allow that to happen. That's the point. Just like your government shouldn't (and likely doesn't) allow you to take what you want from the grocery store without paying for it... even though no doubt you'd "like this way better," too.

[–] Butler_crosley 2 points (+2|-0)

No, I am free to choose what I want to ignore and the block sub option allows me to exercise that.

I am against theft and not because the government or a religion says it is wrong. I believe that people should be compensated (within reason) for their work therefore I do not steal or condone it.