1

Can we haz default subscriber-exclusive /all/new plz? owo

posted by 16Mega on AskPhuks

For instance, click rates show that my sub is overwhelmingly popular with the general Phuks crowd – yet no one actually subscribes! =/

I understand. Obviously, this is due to cancel-culture peer pressure taking its toll. That, and of course also because our fans –
especially those who come for their daily hateb0ner… ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
– don’t have to subscribe, as via /all/new, they get all the good stuff without any commitment anyway!

I believe it is really a matter of fairness that the subs one enjoys in one’s feed, one also gets to be subscribed to. This could even be an automated process.

Then add a sitewide random sticky to the top of /all/new – to keep things nice’n’agitated.

Bᴀʀʀᴀɢᴇ ᴏғ ɴᴇᴏᴘʜᴏʙɪᴄ ʀᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟɪᴢᴀᴛɪᴏɴs ᴀs ᴛᴏ ᴡʜʏ ᴡᴇ ᴄᴀɴ’ᴛ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ɴɪᴄᴇ ᴛʜɪɴɢs ɪɴ 3, 2, 1, …

For instance, click rates show that *my* sub is ***overwhelmingly popular*** with the general Phuks crowd – yet **no one** actually subscribes! =/ I understand. Obviously, this is due to cancel-culture peer pressure taking its toll. That, and of course also because ***our fans*** – >! especially those who come for their daily hateb0ner… ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)!< – ***don’t have to*** subscribe, as via /all/new, they get all the good stuff without any commitment anyway! I believe it is really a matter of fairness that the subs one enjoys in one’s feed, one also gets to be subscribed to. This could even be an automated process. Then add a sitewide random sticky to the top of /all/new – to keep things nice’n’agitated. ***Bᴀʀʀᴀɢᴇ ᴏғ ɴᴇᴏᴘʜᴏʙɪᴄ ʀᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟɪᴢᴀᴛɪᴏɴs ᴀs ᴛᴏ ᴡʜʏ ᴡᴇ ᴄᴀɴ’ᴛ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ɴɪᴄᴇ ᴛʜɪɴɢs ɪɴ 3, 2, 1, …***

17 comments

[–] Butler_crosley 1 points (+2|-1)

Edited

I use the block sub feature to keep some subs out of my feed because I'm not interested in reading those posts. The other subs I don't mind seeing since there is little activity in the subs I've subscribed to. I like this way better.

[–] [Deleted] 1 points (+3|-2)

Heaven forbid you disagree with them! They think that free speech means that you are obligated to listen to whatever they babble about.

[–] Loki88 -1 points (+1|-2)

Heaven forbid you ask them what their actual stance is and engage in discussion with them instead of contenting yourself in snarking out made-up, conveniently bogus strawman arguments.

Aren't you the one who didn't even deny or protest when she was compared to Hillary Clinton and her "deplorables" shtick?

How unfortunately typical.

[–] 16Mega [OP] -1 points (+1|-2)

You do realize that a subscription-based feed also won't contain my or anyone else's sub... unless you subscribe to it.

Oh wait.