10

When it first popped up I made an account and took a look. I liked the 'free speech' and 'all are welcome' sales pitch. But at the time it was mostly vacant, and I didn't really like the layout.

I've gone back a couple times to have a quick look, and it's getting ugly. Maybe I'm not setting up my account or preferences or something, but when I logged in and clicked on 'categories' then 'philosophy' and got a page full of images with memes and other empty content. When I clicked on 'science' I got a page filled with discussions about gender or climate change, and nothing else.

Did I accidentally put gab into voat-mode?

Also, it just doesn't have a community feel. More like being in the midst of a mob. There's no compartmentalization, it's all one big group rather than a union of smaller groups.

I don't get it.
What's the appeal, or what am I doing wrong?

When it first popped up I made an account and took a look. I liked the 'free speech' and 'all are welcome' sales pitch. But at the time it was mostly vacant, and I didn't really like the layout. I've gone back a couple times to have a quick look, and it's getting ugly. Maybe I'm not setting up my account or preferences or something, but when I logged in and clicked on 'categories' then 'philosophy' and got a page full of images with memes and other empty content. When I clicked on 'science' I got a page filled with discussions about gender or climate change, and *nothing* else. Did I accidentally put gab into voat-mode? Also, it just doesn't have a community feel. More like being in the midst of a mob. There's no compartmentalization, it's all one big group rather than a union of smaller groups. I don't get it. What's the appeal, or what am I doing wrong?

37 comments

[–] Owlchemy 1 points (+1|-0)

I agree and I thought that was what Gab was going to be ... but it doesn't appear to have worked. I've never had a Twitter account, but when I signed up to Gab, I expected that. It does appear many platforms and businesses now are snubbing the people who use them and coming up with their own rules, generally falling in line with a leftist agenda. It's really none of their business ... if it's legal, why should anyone care. Instead they try to force their own views on all once they have a virtual monopoly.

[–] GreenTreeFrog 1 points (+1|-0) Edited

Who within these organisations are making these decisions and what are they basing the decision choices on. I wonder where the accountability is within the company. Is the CEO saying top down 'do it this way' or are the marketing slime saying to the rest of the company 'we should do this cause people will like it and our brand will sell better/gain credibility.'

Gab is too hard to understand for the newbie using hitting the site IMO. Newbies need simple handholding.

[–] Owlchemy 1 points (+1|-0)

I generally take the time to figure out a site if I think it's going to be of interest. But they just didn't have a layout or content that made me interested in investing much time in it. As for the corporate stuff ... who knows ... most are based in the most loony locales in CA, so that may have something to do with it.

[–] GreenTreeFrog 2 points (+2|-0)

Business is supposed to make decisions in the interest of highest profits for their shareholders - yes? Privately owned business is different, they can express what the owner wants as long as they are ready to take a potential money hit.