5

Do you think black people should be forced to bake burning cross cakes for klansmen?

Do you think Jews should be forced to bake swastika cakes for neo-nazis?

Should the Muslim baker be forced to draw muhammad fucking a goat if I want to celebrate the day Trump dropped a MOAB?

This is not discrimination and is not comparable to something like the fair housing act.

The very notion of using the govt. to force someone else to do work for you is akin to slavery.

When you protect individual rights you protect group rights.

So now they're after the baker once more b/c he didn't want to bake a tranny cake b/c of whatever his religious beliefs are.

Pay close attention to the wording in this article. He never refused to sell anyone a cake. He refused to make one to those specifications.

A nazi goes to buy a house that has the star of david painted on it. He wants the house but doesn't want it as is. Is the nazi being discriminated against b/c he can't force the jew to paint over it for him so the house is to his specifications?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2018/08/15/baker-claims-religious-persecution-again-this-time-after-denying-cake-for-transgender-woman/?utm_term=.93739b746d28

The straight gigolo refuses to suck the dick of the gay client that walks into his brothel. By this logic the gay guy was discriminated against b/c he didn't get his blowjob.

It's this simple. It works for me. It works for you.

edit : changed bottom link to the Gadsden Flag as I accidentally linked the article twice leaving it out.

Do you think black people should be forced to bake burning cross cakes for klansmen? Do you think Jews should be forced to bake swastika cakes for neo-nazis? Should the Muslim baker be forced to draw muhammad fucking a goat if I want to celebrate the day Trump dropped a MOAB? >This is not discrimination and is not comparable to something like the fair housing act. The very notion of using the govt. to force someone else to do work for you is akin to slavery. >When you protect individual rights you protect group rights. So now they're after the baker once more b/c he didn't want to bake a tranny cake b/c of whatever his religious beliefs are. >Pay close attention to the wording in this article. He never refused to sell anyone a cake. He refused to make one to those specifications. A nazi goes to buy a house that has the star of david painted on it. He wants the house but doesn't want it as is. Is the nazi being discriminated against b/c he can't force the jew to paint over it for him so the house is to his specifications? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2018/08/15/baker-claims-religious-persecution-again-this-time-after-denying-cake-for-transgender-woman/?utm_term=.93739b746d28 The straight gigolo refuses to suck the dick of the gay client that walks into his brothel. By this logic the gay guy was discriminated against b/c he didn't get his blowjob. [It's this simple. It works for me. It works for you.](https://imgoat.com/uploads/00da03b685/138561.jpg) edit : changed bottom link to the Gadsden Flag as I accidentally linked the article twice leaving it out.

6 comments

[–] smallpond 1 points (+1|-0)

I'm not saying that I disagree with the Baker refusing, but the actual cake asked for seems relevant/interesting:

In June 2017, Colorado lawyer Autumn Scardina called Masterpiece Cakeshop to request a custom cake that was blue on the outside and pink on the inside.

The occasion, Scardina told the bakery’s employees, was to celebrate her birthday, as well as the seventh anniversary of the day she had come out as transgender.

Looks like the 'tranny cake' was basically just a pink cake with blue icing, that people probably wouldn't think twice about without the accompanying transgender story.

[–] Hitchens 1 points (+1|-0)

She also placed the order on the day the Supreme Court decision came down.

I don’t like this whole cake mess or the outcome of the court case but this seems like she’s just looking for trouble and public outrage.