Yes and no. I completely agree that what we see as Tucker is a character or farce, but he's going so far against the neocons that it has me confused. Who would fund him when he's attacks the largest party funders he somewhat used to relate to?
Yes and no. I completely agree that what we see as Tucker is a character or farce, but he's going so far against the neocons that it has me confused. Who would fund him when he's attacks the largest party funders he somewhat used to relate to?
Carlson is just trying to disavow any traces of libertarian leanings he once claimed to have. Attacking the Koch Brothers is his way of saying "see I'm a populist just like Trump."