13 comments
Why do you spam the site with content you feel is bullshit? Do you think polarizing an issue and arguing the most extreme ends of it, is a reasonable way to get discussion? Do you think after trying it more than a dozen times with no results, that maybe it'd be better to try something else?
Every post you make is polarized politics. You don't upvote other users or contribute anything outside of politics. You don't seem to like the site, or enjoy your time here.
So why are you here?
Why do you spam the site with content you feel is bullshit?
Do you think polarizing an issue and arguing the most extreme ends of it, is a reasonable way to get discussion?
Do you think after trying it more than a dozen times with no results, that maybe it'd be better to try something else?
Every post you make is polarized politics.
You don't upvote other users or contribute anything outside of politics. You don't seem to like the site, or enjoy your time here.
So why are you here?
Why do you cut and paste the same message?
Are you that lazy? Or just stupid?
Why do you cut and paste the same message?
Are you that lazy? Or just stupid?
On behalf of the universe, I apologize for @InnocentBystander .
On behalf of the universe, I apologize for @InnocentBystander .
Thanks, but meh.
I've been on this forum stuff for 20+ years. I've seen it all, been called everything in the book. Sticks and stones and all that. I have a pretty tough skin when it comes to people being unreasonably caustic.
IB is probably just trying to protect "it's site". After being on voat and seeing how they treat new people, IB is a nothing burger in the face of that onslaught of assholery!
Thanks, but meh.
I've been on this forum stuff for 20+ years. I've seen it all, been called everything in the book. Sticks and stones and all that. I have a pretty tough skin when it comes to people being unreasonably caustic.
IB is probably just trying to protect "it's site". After being on voat and seeing how they treat new people, IB is a nothing burger in the face of that onslaught of assholery!
So eager to attack me that you don't care who you're supporting.
Is your hatred of me so strong that you so quickly assist a troll in string up drama and politics, that you know the others don't want?
You understand he's here to shit on the site, right? You help out just to spite me?
My opinion of you wasn't high, but you manged to stoop even lower.
I'd suggest you think about your priorities. If you don't learn to let things go, you're going to end up just as miserable as Op.
So eager to attack me that you don't care who you're supporting.
Is your hatred of me so strong that you so quickly assist a troll in string up drama and politics, that you know the others don't want?
You understand he's here to shit on the site, right? You help out just to spite me?
My opinion of you wasn't high, but you manged to stoop even lower.
I'd suggest you think about your priorities. If you don't learn to let things go, you're going to end up just as miserable as Op.
Author has a valid point about poor countries going to rich countries and gaining productivity.
Author misses the point about Remittance of cash back to the country of origin being the (sole?) driver of economic activity outside of the barter system. This, imo, is the crux of the issue - without the remittance of cash back to their native countries, those countries collpase - so the official policy is to encourage as much migration as possible - less cost at home combined with increase flow of cash into the economy without having to grow it organically or with investment. This allows the elites of that country to keep as much lucre as possible AND keep the populace in enough flux to not revolt.