What is not clear, is what C02 has to do with it exactly, and if anything, to what degree.
so does CO2 absorb or block heat?
this should be easy enough to prove or demonstrate
Ignoring the fact that warmer climate is good for life is not science.
As I said before, it's the rate of change that messes things up.
like an auto crash.
> What is not clear, is what C02 has to do with it exactly, and if anything, to what degree.
so does CO2 absorb or block heat?
this should be easy enough to prove or demonstrate
---
> Ignoring the fact that warmer climate is good for life is not science.
As I said before, it's the rate of change that messes things up.
like an auto crash.
As I said before, it's the rate of change that messes things up.
and as I said before, that could be bullshit. Carlson show compelling evidence that it is bullshit.
>As I said before, it's the rate of change that messes things up.
and as I said before, that could be bullshit. Carlson show compelling evidence that it is bullshit.
Since Randall Carlson is a three hour video, the easiest way to sort this out is by reference to science fundamentals
- Are CO2 levels rising?
- Are CO2 levels rising unusual?
- Are CO2 Levels changing at an unusual rate? (if so, what is the cause?)
- Is it possible to measure CO2 in air bubbles in Ice?
- Does CO2 absorb/block heat?
- Does CO2 level rise have any consequences?
if his conclusions conflict with the fundamental facts of science, then I do not have go wading through all of his other material.
Since Randall Carlson is a three hour video, the easiest way to sort this out is by reference to science fundamentals
* Are CO2 levels rising?
* Are CO2 levels rising unusual?
* Are CO2 Levels changing at an unusual rate? (if so, what is the cause?)
* Is it possible to measure CO2 in air bubbles in Ice?
* Does CO2 absorb/block heat?
* Does CO2 level rise have any consequences?
----
if his conclusions conflict with the fundamental facts of science, then I do not have go wading through all of his other material.
No one is denying climate change. Of course the climate is changing, it has been for 4.5 billion years by our best guess.
What is not clear, is what C02 has to do with it exactly, and if anything, to what degree. Rising C02 could be a result, rather than a driver. No one knows. So called scientists are paid to prove that it is C02, that is all. They don't get paid to look for other causes, indeed if they do so they will be punished.
That is not science.
Ignoring the myriad of other possible causes is not science. eg.. that big ball of fire in the sky...
Censoring other possibilities to the point of threatening jail is not science.
Ignoring facts that don't support the climate change agenda is not science.
eg.. Carlson addresses ice core data in that video, as well as other historical data.
Ignoring the fact that warmer climate is good for life is not science.
Whatever the case, no reason to allow the governments of the world to steal money from citizens. Which is the sole reason for the climate change religion.