As I said before, it's the rate of change that messes things up.
and as I said before, that could be bullshit. Carlson show compelling evidence that it is bullshit.
>As I said before, it's the rate of change that messes things up.
and as I said before, that could be bullshit. Carlson show compelling evidence that it is bullshit.
Since Randall Carlson is a three hour video, the easiest way to sort this out is by reference to science fundamentals
- Are CO2 levels rising?
- Are CO2 levels rising unusual?
- Are CO2 Levels changing at an unusual rate? (if so, what is the cause?)
- Is it possible to measure CO2 in air bubbles in Ice?
- Does CO2 absorb/block heat?
- Does CO2 level rise have any consequences?
if his conclusions conflict with the fundamental facts of science, then I do not have go wading through all of his other material.
Since Randall Carlson is a three hour video, the easiest way to sort this out is by reference to science fundamentals
* Are CO2 levels rising?
* Are CO2 levels rising unusual?
* Are CO2 Levels changing at an unusual rate? (if so, what is the cause?)
* Is it possible to measure CO2 in air bubbles in Ice?
* Does CO2 absorb/block heat?
* Does CO2 level rise have any consequences?
----
if his conclusions conflict with the fundamental facts of science, then I do not have go wading through all of his other material.
so does CO2 absorb or block heat?
this should be easy enough to prove or demonstrate
As I said before, it's the rate of change that messes things up.
like an auto crash.