Anyone want to weigh in on what the default/system subs should be?
But why should that require an extra "protection" layer? They already are anon on the internet. If you anticipate controversy with your statement, don't make it unless you're prepared to defend it. It just seems extra cowardly.
But why should that require an extra "protection" layer? They already are anon on the internet. If you anticipate controversy with your statement, don't make it unless you're prepared to defend it. It just seems extra cowardly.
Extra cowardly or not it’s still speech and should be encouraged if it’s a bad idea it will be shown to be such.
Extra cowardly or not it’s still speech and should be encouraged if it’s a bad idea it will be shown to be such.
I guess we'll agree to disagree. Hope we don't reap repercussions for not being super-duper anon.
I guess we'll agree to disagree. Hope we don't reap repercussions for not being super-duper anon.
Well I disagree with your idea here, I think users should be able to ask questions or make statements without outting themselves, it encourages speech rather than deters it.