Sure, they're all over the place.
- Unvaccinated are looking at death. We have really good statistics on this now two years in. Plenty of unvaccinated are at statistically zero risk of death and severe illness. If you're 80+ and obese, you should indeed be worried because you probably have like a 50% chance of death. If you're 55 and obese, you might be worried too. If you're 20 and healthy, you absolutely not are at risk of death or severe illness by any reasonable standard.
- "If you're vaccinated, and you have your booster shot, you’re protected from severe illness and death, period." Obviously false and situation dependent again. An 80+ boosted adult is at more of severe illness and death than the healthy, 20 year-old unvaxed.
His statement is self-contradictory if you look at the data by risk category. How many lies are there come down to how you define things like "risk" or "severe", but there is tautologically at least one.
You appear to have misinterpreted the statement the statement completely.
Plenty of unvaccinated are at statistically zero risk of death and severe illness
That is just wrong.
"If you're vaccinated, and you have your booster shot, you’re protected from severe illness and death, period."
This statement you have presented as a quote but it's something you made up.
tl;dr you're an idiot.
That is just wrong.
I'm sorry you haven't taken the effort to look at official statistics of risk of death by age and comorbidities. The unmistakable conclusions is covid is a major, significant risk to some populations and irrelevant for others. Not sure why you're choosing this hill to die on when health authorities agree there is a tremendous effect by age. Toss in other health factors and there are definitely subpopulations where covid risk is irrelevant. Turn off the fear tube.
This statement you have presented as a quote but it's something you made up.
It's in the article. Did you read it? If somebody made it up, it certainly wasn't me. Go complain to The Hill. This is incredibly well reported on now from multiple sources. I could link to a Fox News article to the same effect if you'd like, so once again it's a strange hill to die on.
tl;dr you're an idiot.
Ad hominem is a sure sign of insightfulness. You've contributed nothing to this conversation except vague, uncited claims and insults. Good day.
Please can you point out the lies in that quote.