My point was he wasn't arrested over a first ammendment issue of burning a flag.
My point was he wasn't arrested over a first ammendment issue of burning a flag.
My point was he wasn't arrested over a first ammendment issue of burning a flag.
It's the headline from the article.
But your point seems to be in comparing the stealing of a flag to all of the "destruction of personal property over the last year". Is that correct?