It's the headline from the article.
But your point seems to be in comparing the stealing of a flag to all of the "destruction of personal property over the last year". Is that correct?
It's the headline from the article.
But your point seems to be in comparing the stealing of a flag to all of the "destruction of personal property over the last year". Is that correct?
My point was he wasn't arrested over a first ammendment issue of burning a flag.
My point was he wasn't arrested over a first ammendment issue of burning a flag.
A flag he stole from a church that is. For someone crying about destruction of personal property over the last year. You sure seemed to have neglected that little fact in your headline.