the burden of proof is on the accuser (you) but i'll bite anyway.
one group is a violent majority in a country with hostile social relations with the US who generally have a very poor opinion of liberal politics.
the other is a violent minority in a country that has an oppressive ability to track and prevent communications with those whose governments or peoples are anti-US.
*just because they are both scary doesn't make them the same.
I thought that the side that chooses violence over debate were the bad people.
I don't know what you are referencing about the tracking and prevention of communication.
that sounds like a very comic book way of characterizing good and bad. if they were the same people, i'd expect communication and coordination, not a single general similarity.
How are the mobs different?