I really don't like click-bait like "Pentagon admits ufos are real". Obviously there are many unidentified objects in the sky where you won't know exactly what it is, and when I look at most ufo enthusiasts they do not do a good job of vetting or being critical.
I find the Navy pilot testimony interesting because the objects were tracked on radar and visually.
What I am hoping for confirmation of whether there are hundreds of examples of the radar and pilot eyesight confirming the anomalies, so far the leaked videos.
I've seen interesting triangular ufos ... interesting but anything that's not violating laws of physics may be a fluke or could be some drone.
I have heard we corroborated with Russia on this but I need to see solid evidence, not just something a reporter claimed. But it would be interesting if Russian pilots saw the tic-tacs.
I think because these go back decades there's no way Russia or China made them, if they had those capabilities they would be projecting more force on the US.
I've seen a few decent analyses' on the recently released military videos. One key point that's brought up a lot is that they're in infer red which can distort what you're looking at.
The videos are amazing If truly legit, but they just seem somewhat misleading.
I personally would lump in the California jet pack in this whole category. Which is another weird ufo phenomenon that defies our current tech.