7

I really don't like click-bait like "Pentagon admits ufos are real". Obviously there are many unidentified objects in the sky where you won't know exactly what it is, and when I look at most ufo enthusiasts they do not do a good job of vetting or being critical.

I find the Navy pilot testimony interesting because the objects were tracked on radar and visually.

What I am hoping for confirmation of whether there are hundreds of examples of the radar and pilot eyesight confirming the anomalies, so far the leaked videos.

I've seen interesting triangular ufos ... interesting but anything that's not violating laws of physics may be a fluke or could be some drone.

I have heard we corroborated with Russia on this but I need to see solid evidence, not just something a reporter claimed. But it would be interesting if Russian pilots saw the tic-tacs.

I think because these go back decades there's no way Russia or China made them, if they had those capabilities they would be projecting more force on the US.

I really don't like click-bait like "Pentagon admits ufos are real". Obviously there are many unidentified objects in the sky where you won't know exactly what it is, and when I look at most ufo enthusiasts they do not do a good job of vetting or being critical. I find the Navy pilot testimony interesting because the objects were tracked on radar and visually. What I am hoping for confirmation of whether there are hundreds of examples of the radar and pilot eyesight confirming the anomalies, so far the leaked videos. I've seen interesting triangular ufos ... interesting but anything that's not violating laws of physics may be a fluke or could be some drone. I have heard we corroborated with Russia on this but I need to see solid evidence, not just something a reporter claimed. But it would be interesting if Russian pilots saw the tic-tacs. I think because these go back decades there's no way Russia or China made them, if they had those capabilities they would be projecting more force on the US.

4 comments

[–] PhunkyPlatypus 1 points (+1|-0)

I've seen a few decent analyses' on the recently released military videos. One key point that's brought up a lot is that they're in infer red which can distort what you're looking at.

The videos are amazing If truly legit, but they just seem somewhat misleading.

I personally would lump in the California jet pack in this whole category. Which is another weird ufo phenomenon that defies our current tech.

[–] CountHonorius 1 points (+1|-0)

I'd be willing to bet that their technology is similar to that of the mechanical 'chupa-chupa' devices that attacked civilians in the Amazon delta in the late '70s. Even though they were associated with "aliens" immediately, there was something about the tech that was too Earthly. Some even mentioned stuff that Siemens was working on at the time. These 'chupas' were coffin-sized vehicles that fired beams at people, clearly unmanned. I agree that corroboration from other air forces would be essential.

[–] PhunkyPlatypus 0 points (+0|-0)

I'm gonna have to look into that one as I'm unfamiliar with it. But it sounds interesting.

[–] leaderofnopack 0 points (+1|-1)

I remember in the late 70s CBS did a segment on something flying fast and making 90° turns, this was even on radar at LAX. I say there must be something out there as we can't be the only planet in the universe with life, I agree with Carl Sagans 1% theory.