The paragraph I "quoted" came from the statement from the owner of Solace Foot Health and Reflexology which is in the embedded tweet that is included in that article
The paragraph I "quoted" came from the [statement from the owner of Solace Foot Health and Reflexology which is in the embedded tweet that is included in that article](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EbR_7CiXsAAH45Q?format=png&name=small)
Are the mirror, express or mail slightly better sources for you than an infowars source?
Or how about even Reuters publishing she was fired?
Are the [mirror](https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/breaking-burnley-fan-behind-white-22246694), [express](https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1300385/Burnley-fan-White-Lives-Matter-banner-girlfriend-sacked-racist-comments) or [mail](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8454627/Burnley-fan-White-Lives-Matter-banner-reveals-60-people-organised-stunt.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailUK) slightly better sources for you than an infowars source?
Or how about even [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-soccer-england-burnley-race-idUKKBN23V317) publishing she was fired?
The paragraph that you have "quoted" does not appear in the article.
However this one does.
However your crackpot source words it, she left.