7

7 comments

[–] ScorpioGlitch 2 points (+2|-0)

Even so, taking the devices would have at least added a layer of "trail covering" since they would have had to get access to the online account without any evidence that the phone was on him.

So the real questions are: how is it that:

  1. This newspaper had the resources to determine all this (including fingerprint dusting)

  2. This newspaper can do what appears to be real journalism but US newspapers are still a joke?

[–] doggone [OP] 1 points (+1|-0)

As far as we know, this newspaper is just a mouthpiece for the Turkish government. No evidence of journalistic investigation.