Strength/fitness> "beauty" To a degree of course. Too much of a thing is always going to be freakish looking. Even too much "beauty" if someone had work done to be exactly symmetrical and proportional it would look jarring.
We can destroy the fat acceptance movement in a day if we can sell the idea that strength and fitness are preferred over being beautiful. It's not about being "pretty" it's about being strong and fit. It just so happens that strong and fit people are usually more attractive.
This is even backed up by our ancestors. The Trojan war was fought over Helen, the most beautiful mortal woman. The absolute limit of beauty. What started the war was a single golden apple from the garden of hesperides. So Helen/Beauty=1 apple.
There is another story about Atalanta. She was a tough bitch who grew up just as strong and capable as the men. Infamously her father declared she had to be married and she was pissed. So she made it a game, beat her in a footrace and win her hand or lose and die. Many men tried and died for their effort. so she was worth dying for, clearly. It took a cheating son of a bitch 3 of the above golden apples used as a distraction to beat her. Atalanta=3x the worth of Helen. Strength>Beauty.
All the boobs!
The overall fitness level of the woman is most attractive to me. That tends to lead to smaller breasts, but I'm okay with either. Just no fatties!