So no free speech and no right to bear arms?
So no free speech and no right to bear arms?
The constitution didn't ban those. 1A and 2A should just be inalienable rights to all humans. They were good additions, but shouldn't have had to be added in the first place.
The constitution didn't ban those. 1A and 2A should just be inalienable rights to all humans. They were good additions, but shouldn't have had to be added in the first place.
The constitution really should have never been amended in the first place. It is perfectly fine as it was written.