The constitution didn't ban those. 1A and 2A should just be inalienable rights to all humans. They were good additions, but shouldn't have had to be added in the first place.
The constitution didn't ban those. 1A and 2A should just be inalienable rights to all humans. They were good additions, but shouldn't have had to be added in the first place.
So no free speech and no right to bear arms?