You simply won't recognize sources.
Members of Congress pass laws to stop child trafficking -- and then the ACLU comes in and creates a gigantic incentive to engage in child trafficking.
The parents are so broken up about being separated from "their" children that hundreds of them have gone home without them. Reams of articles hysterically claimed that the evil Trump administration tricked these super-involved parents into signing forms they couldn't understand!
-- "Migrant parents were misled into waiving rights to family reunification, ACLU tells court" -- The Washington Post, July 26 2018
-- "Immigrant Parents Unwittingly Signed Away Right to Reunite With Children, Lawyers Say" -- Huffington Post, 07/25/2018
You support pedophilia or something? You clearly support trafficking children.
-- "'Why Did You Leave Me?' The Migrant Children Left Behind as Parents Are Deported'" -- The New York Times, July 27, 2018
You aren't reading the context to those 'sources'.
The parents are so broken up about being separated from "their" children that hundreds of them have gone home without them. Reams of articles hysterically claimed that the evil Trump administration tricked these super-involved parents into signing forms they couldn't understand!
And the protext:
Nowhere will you read that the form the parents signed was written by the ACLU.
If those are sources, why is she disputing them?
Nowhere will you read that the form the parents signed was written by the ACLU.
Have you ever dared think the ACLU isn't what it's promoted as? The ACLU is largely political nonsense. If you think they give a shit about black people... well that's just funny these days.
My and your opinions on the issue do not matter. Her article does not cite any sources, so its status as news is questionable.