I think "not news" is accurate enough. It doesn't make a great deal of sense to start categorising things that need to be flaired, it just creates more work and room for error.
I think "not news" is accurate enough. It doesn't make a great deal of sense to start categorising things that need to be flaired, it just creates more work and room for error.
I have nothing to do with that sub and this question isn't a comment on the moderation or your stance but would you have felt ok with
Editorial
as a tag? I'm not even sure if it's a good fit for the article(I haven't read yet) but just throwing it out there.