I don't care, that's not the point I am trying to make.
She is clearly disputing the articles that you claim are her sources. If she is disputing what they say, they are not sources. They aren't backing up what she is claiming. She is literally telling us not to trust them, because they are obscuring information.
If they were sources, she wouldn't be disputing them. She'd be using them as evidence to back up what she is trying to say. They are not sources.
I don't care, that's not the point I am trying to make.
She is clearly disputing the articles that you claim are her sources. If she is disputing what they say, they are not sources. They aren't backing up what she *is* claiming. She is literally telling us not to trust them, because they are obscuring information.
If they were sources, she wouldn't be disputing them. She'd be using them as evidence to back up what she is trying to say. They are not sources.
I don't care, that's not the point I am trying to make.
She is clearly disputing the articles that you claim are her sources. If she is disputing what they say, they are not sources. They aren't backing up what she is claiming. She is literally telling us not to trust them, because they are obscuring information.
If they were sources, she wouldn't be disputing them. She'd be using them as evidence to back up what she is trying to say. They are not sources.