So, I am providing users here of a unique perspective that otherwise had not been provided, and to you, that is spam. Others would claim it is expanding the knowledge base. It's akin to bring out the 8th grade primer when we are all used to the 7th grade one and you throwing a hissy fit that there is NEW THINGS in here!!!.
The site contains articles from award winning journalists like Robert Fisk. It is very anti-establishment, and you calling it "garbage" means, to me, that it is worthy of continuing to post. Anything that pisses you off is worth doing over and over and over again.
So, I am providing users here of a unique perspective that otherwise had not been provided, and that is spam.
When it is not wanted, yes. Who are you to tell me what I should be exposed to?
It's akin to bring out the 8th grade primer when we are all used to the 7th grade one.
Except that 'Counterpunch' is 'Where's Waldo'. You are not above the other users. You are surrounded by your betters here.
Anything that pisses you off is worth doing over and over and over again.
Naturally it's all about you and what you want. Phuk the other users and their desires, right?
and you calling it "garbage" means, to me ..
Nobody cares what it means to you. Nobody cares what you think.
The users have rejected it, and you. So don't be a spammer.
Posting the same site over and over, even when it becomes clear that it is not wanted, is spam.
I am familiar with the site. It is garbage. It makes Brietbart or Huffpo look balabnced. That's probably what users don't like it.
You insult me and cry like a bitch, but I just know you're going to accuse me of being the immature one again.
Self-reflection, look it up.
Alts? You are going to accuse me of using alts? I guess that's what happens when you judge others by your own standards. You must think everyone is an angry sock-puppet.