Phuks' "Third-party disclosure" section of the privacy policy is satisfactory to me. They recognize that they might be required to share info under the law, and with those involved in the operation of the site, but otherwise commit to not selling or transferring personal info without advance notice.
I'm also satisfied with Phuks' canary, with the minor grammar nitpick that "to which we currently am an active contributor" should probably read "to which we are currently an active contributor."
Phuks' "Third-party disclosure" section of the privacy policy is satisfactory to me. They recognize that they might be required to share info under the law, and with those involved in the operation of the site, but otherwise commit to not selling or transferring personal info without advance notice.
I'm also satisfied with Phuks' canary, with the minor grammar nitpick that "to which we currently am an active contributor" should probably read "to which we are currently an active contributor."
Because there are not assurances to be had. You can't guarantee that, there's no way of knowing. You'd have to own all hardware and infrastructure between the client and server--all of them. They're doing the best they can given that fact. Apache/Nginx/IIS logs but no correlative data, basically--I assume.