9

20 comments

[–] MirrorMan 8 points (+8|-0) Edited

It could be amazing and I'd still never see it on principle. I have an interest in new ideas getting produced. The current entertainment paradigm is so skewed towards remakes and sequels that I feel any momentum added in that direction is directly contributing to diminishing the chance of new ideas or new ip being created. The long game here is that if only a limited number of entertainment ideas exist it is easier to maintain a ludicrous monopoly over both success and creation of ideas by controlling the environment. Of course, Disney stands to gain the most out of this ecosystem.

It is a scenario where entertainment succeeds spectacularly on a monetary level and fails, in my opinion, on a purpose level. At its core what is the purpose of visual media? Is it to generate income or is it to express ideas? Because if the highest priority is simply money, then you can engineer an environment to maximize that goal. And as far as I can tell the best environment for generating money in media is owning successful ideas. If you are in Disney's shoes and own a supermajority of successful ideas it is in your best interest not to encourage more ideas for competition but instead actively create an atmosphere hostile to new ideas by engineering a cycle of sequels to reboots to sequels to spinoffs to sequels etc. Drowning out the competition by influencing the culture's expectations.

[–] Dii_Casses 0 points (+0|-0) Edited

The current entertainment paradigm is so skewed towards remakes and sequels that I feel any momentum added in that direction is directly contributing to diminishing the chance of new ideas or new ip being created

On one hand I agree, but on the other hand there is nothing new under the sun. Most (if not all) of Disney's animated classics are re-imagining old stories, with Aladdin probably being one of the oldest.

[–] xyzzy 4 points (+4|-0)

Doesn't look good to me. Looks to me like many recent movies, overdone CGI with little plot, acting or humour. I don't like how they set the priorities in movies today, especially Disney.

[–] [Deleted] 2 points (+2|-0)

It looks okay. Not something I would make a point to see, but if I needed something to watch with the kids, I'm sure it would entertain me.

[–] [Deleted] 1 points (+1|-0)

What is your favourite film?

It's a tie between this one and this one

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+0|-0)

Not seen those, need to check them out.

Speed Racer is done to style of the cartoon and is meant to be that way. Between the story itself, character arcs, and the cinematography, I give it 5 stars. The only bit I have some issue with is a few too many flashbacks at the beginning of the film but I consider it a reasonable evil to get the viewer up to speed on the setting and current story arc.

Lost in Space has all of the original actors in one place or another except the original Dr. Smith. It seems like it was intended to be the movie/pilot that the original show really deserved and I think that they did well enough with it that it really should have had a series with the same cast, picking up where the movie stopped. They even managed to have reasonable character development within the running time - something that few too movies even have the capacity for since they require so much plot or action to deal with plot holes.

Neither one uses the "blockbuster formula" so they didn't do all that well in the box office but with nearly every movie following that formula to the point of it becoming cliche now, I think it's a refreshing reminder of stories for the sake of the story and uses all the elements correctly instead of feeding off our hard-wired evolutionary desire to see action, death, destruction, and mayhem despite both of them having a reasonable share of each.

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+0|-0)

This looks like raw sewage.