I know, you're intentionally missing the point here again.
What point? I'm still waiting for you to get to one.
That's not "mocking", that's just being an asshole.
If I'm an asshole (something I don't deny) then what does it say about you, that you can't get enough of me?
Did you know that I was implying that there was no source in your original comment
I never denied that.
instead of asserting that there was no source at all anywhere on the internet?
Dude, I don't know how I can say this in simpler terms. I never said anything about 'internet sources'. Why are you so focused on something that has no connection to this conversation, or me.
The 'sources' I've alluded to are all contained within this thread.
You really need to watch this video. It might save you from a lot of embarrassment in the future.
If I'm an asshole (something I don't deny) then what does it say about you, that you can't get enough of me?
Don't exclude yourself from this, you can't get enough of me either as we're both spending a pathetic amount of time on this with each other.
I never said anything about 'internet sources'. Why are you so focused on something that has no connection to this conversation, or me.
"you provided no source" != "There was no source"
Remember this?
The 'sources' I've alluded to are all contained within this thread.
You said you didn't provide any source. If you didn't provide any source have I provided the source? Wouldn't be easier to just be direct instead of being intentionally obtuse and wasting not just my time but yours as well?
I never denied that.
That's such a passive way to answer.
Don't exclude yourself from this,
I'm not. I'm loving this. I think I already mentioned that.
It's well know that I hunt tards for sport, and you're a record setter.
Remember this?
I don't see any mention of 'random internet'. You got confused (as usual) and jumped to conclusions (as usual), and in the end, it turns out you just don't understand simple English (as usual).
You said you didn't provide any source.
Still yes.
If you didn't provide any source have I provided the source?
Your English is broken.
Wouldn't be easier to just be direct instead of being intentionally obtuse and wasting not just my time but your's as well?
'Easier' is answering with a short direct statement.
Explaining the meaning of basic English words is a job for your mother.
wasting not just my time but your's as well?
No time has been wasted. I've pushed you into learning some new words and ideas, and I have been thoroughly entertained.
Time well spent for both of us.
That's such a passive way to answer.
Is that supposed to be a bad thing? Do you think an emotional, or charged, answer would be better?
You made false claims, so I passively informed you that you're imagining things again. You're going to have to expect to be called out when you make shit up.
I know, you're intentionally missing the point here again. That's not "mocking", that's just being an asshole.
Did you know that I was implying that there was no source in your original comment instead of asserting that there was no source at all anywhere on the internet?