Don't exclude yourself from this,
I'm not. I'm loving this. I think I already mentioned that.
It's well know that I hunt tards for sport, and you're a record setter.
Remember this?
I don't see any mention of 'random internet'. You got confused (as usual) and jumped to conclusions (as usual), and in the end, it turns out you just don't understand simple English (as usual).
You said you didn't provide any source.
Still yes.
If you didn't provide any source have I provided the source?
Your English is broken.
Wouldn't be easier to just be direct instead of being intentionally obtuse and wasting not just my time but your's as well?
'Easier' is answering with a short direct statement.
Explaining the meaning of basic English words is a job for your mother.
wasting not just my time but your's as well?
No time has been wasted. I've pushed you into learning some new words and ideas, and I have been thoroughly entertained.
Time well spent for both of us.
That's such a passive way to answer.
Is that supposed to be a bad thing? Do you think an emotional, or charged, answer would be better?
You made false claims, so I passively informed you that you're imagining things again. You're going to have to expect to be called out when you make shit up.
I don't see any mention of 'random internet'. You got confused (as usual) and jumped to conclusions (as usual), and in the end, it turns out you just don't understand simple English (as usual).
Oh, the source is not random? Who would had thought.
What is the source you're talking about?
I've pushed you into learning some new words and ideas
I googled definitions, but I knew the definitions beforehand. As such there was nothing to learn for me.
Your English is broken.
Yeah, english is not my native tongue. I bet you understood my question anyway.
Is that supposed to be a bad thing? Do you think an emotional, or charged, answer would be better?
Don't you know the difference between a passive and active voice?
http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-active-and-passive-voice.html
If politicians get caught in something or feel guilty they almost always answer in a passive voice.
As such there was nothing to learn for me
Impervious to education eh?
It's a good thing you're entertaining then, because otherwise you'd serve no purpose.
I bet you understood my question anyway.
Do you really think you've been making sense?
Don't you know the difference between a passive and active voice?
That's not what was said, and it's not what the word passive means. 'passive voice' is a phrase.
Phrase is the next word you're going to learn today. Go look it up, I'll wait again.
You really suck at English.
If politicians get caught in something or feel guilty they almost always answer in a passive voice.
If a newt gets it's tail bit off, it can grow a new one.
Don't exclude yourself from this, you can't get enough of me either as we're both spending a pathetic amount of time on this with each other.
"you provided no source" != "There was no source"
Remember this?
You said you didn't provide any source. If you didn't provide any source have I provided the source? Wouldn't be easier to just be direct instead of being intentionally obtuse and wasting not just my time but yours as well?
That's such a passive way to answer.