I said I'd get back to you when I had more time, and I have.
No. You said :
I can't say I'm looking forward to picking this up again
and I responded with "And yet, here you are, unable to walk away."
And then, as you've done often, you used a strawman because you have no rebuttal.
A little like this little tantrum:
That's not what 'tantrum' means. What I said was intentional, controlled, and harsh but not angry.
You keep mistaking my tone for anger. You're not paying attention, or you're projecting. You might be unable to walk away, but I'm not.
Do your best to clearly explain your point of view
Again? Twice wasn't enough for you? Okay:
"you entirely missed the point .. but managed to find offence, despite none being given.
and:
I've read your comment ..There are no actual points."
Get it yet? Am I using words that are too big?
Have you ever wondered why every time you disagree with someone it devolves into something like this?
Have you heard the expression that "if everyone you meet is an asshole, maybe you're the asshole".
Here is a video that might help you understand what's going on here
Not a great memory on you. I said this:
I'll be happy to pick it up after this busy period passes, especially if you're feeling up to discussing the topic rather than playing internet bully.
Though the "happy" part was perhaps overly polite. Amazing that you can proudly quote this:
I've read your comment ..There are no actual points."
The comment had points. You denying the existence of obvious things is on par with you believing yourself psychic.
Not a great memory on you. I said this:
That was not what I was responding to. You have no rebuttal to what I said, so you picked something I had not commented on.
Derp.
The comment had points.
Oh really? Let's examine.
It's reasonable to expect that the thought-processes of a hypothetical god are as unknowable to us as our philosophy is to an amoeba.
Obvious statement is obvious, and poses no question or assertion, other than "God is complicated".
What am I supposed to say, sure?
Nonetheless, the video starts by humbly portraying god and his god as petty violent douches who grapple with the relatively simple concept of "things they don't know".
More air. A simplistic summery of the content injected with a mix of butt-hurt and condescension.
This of course is a concept for retarded meatbags like us.
Speak for yourself. Still no point to be found.
Nonetheless, after painfully labouring the point, we finally arrive at an actual (smug, wasted) human who claims to have created all the gods, but is painfully ignorant of the unknowable question of his own creator that we were forced to watch the idiotic gods deal with.
I can summarize this sentence with one word: Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
It is a summery with an expression of emotion. A description of how you feel about the perceived message.
There is no rational argument, point, or question anywhere in that mess.
I said I'd get back to you when I had more time, and I have.
Sure it is. Another of your "facts" that you seem incapable of explaining.
A little like this little tantrum:
There's no shortage of sad cases on online forums who claim to be psychic - and to know things that they have no way of knowing. If you believe yourself above, you are delusional.
A little tip for you, next time your thought process goes something like. "That idiot is completely wrong, and of course I could explain exactly why, but under no circumstances will I do so." it's probably your mind playing tricks on you.
Do your best to clearly explain your point of view. You might find it harder than you think - and if you get into a real conversation, you might find the idiots bringing up points that you initially missed.
No doubt you won't listen, but I think we're done here. You're pretty much convinced me that you have nothing of worth to say, and I've been far more charitable with you than the average angry voat man-child.