4

31 comments

[–] InnocentBystander [OP] 0 points (+0|-0) Edited

Not a great memory on you. I said this:

That was not what I was responding to. You have no rebuttal to what I said, so you picked something I had not commented on.
Derp.

The comment had points.

Oh really? Let's examine.

It's reasonable to expect that the thought-processes of a hypothetical god are as unknowable to us as our philosophy is to an amoeba.

Obvious statement is obvious, and poses no question or assertion, other than "God is complicated".
What am I supposed to say, sure?

Nonetheless, the video starts by humbly portraying god and his god as petty violent douches who grapple with the relatively simple concept of "things they don't know".

More air. A simplistic summery of the content injected with a mix of butt-hurt and condescension.

This of course is a concept for retarded meatbags like us.

Speak for yourself. Still no point to be found.

Nonetheless, after painfully labouring the point, we finally arrive at an actual (smug, wasted) human who claims to have created all the gods, but is painfully ignorant of the unknowable question of his own creator that we were forced to watch the idiotic gods deal with.

I can summarize this sentence with one word: Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
It is a summery with an expression of emotion. A description of how you feel about the perceived message.
There is no rational argument, point, or question anywhere in that mess.

The idea that you thought that was an acceptable way to start off a genuine conversation explains why you have such difficulty when dealing with others.
This is not how adults talk to each other.

[–] smallpond 0 points (+0|-0)

Nonetheless, after painfully labouring the point, we finally arrive at an actual (smug, wasted) human who claims to have created all the gods, but is painfully ignorant of the unknowable question of his own creator that we were forced to watch the idiotic gods deal with.

The point is clear and obvious. Despite your ridiculous assertion earlier, the video is clearly not a comedy, just review that full last minute of deadpan atheist preaching by the stoned guy if you're not sure. The video tries to sell a religious message to people who don't think enough - of course atheists will be most receptive and I'm guessing you consider yourself one. It makes sense that you tossed your toys after my comment, probably because these issues carry so much emotional weight for you. Try to be rational.

The point is clear: the idiotic Gods are all essentially atheists in that they believe they have no creator. Of course each has knowledge that they are ignorant of and are proven wrong. The stoned human/humanity is in exactly the same boat, but we are supposed to completely forget the lesson learned by each God, and just accept that he created them all without considering the obvious question of whether or not he was created.

I'm guessing the clear point above is not the problem. I'm probably up against some Sunday School teacher that abused you in various ways.

Holy shit dude, another message?
One chain wasn't enough?
I'm not sure that I can keep up with that level of illness.

the video is clearly not a comedy,

That's gold. I'm gonna save this.

that full last minute of deadpan

You're so right. How did I not see that. The 60 seconds of almost rational discourse clearly invalidates all the shit-talk that came before.
All the great philosophical thinkers opened up with choppy animation and low-brow humour.
Nietzsche was famous for his talking dog animations.

The video tries to..

.. make people laugh.

The rest of your comment is just the typical 'MY FEE FEES HURT'.