4

31 comments

[–] InnocentBystander [OP] 0 points (+0|-0) Edited

Not a great memory on you. I said this:

That was not what I was responding to. You have no rebuttal to what I said, so you picked something I had not commented on.
Derp.

The comment had points.

Oh really? Let's examine.

It's reasonable to expect that the thought-processes of a hypothetical god are as unknowable to us as our philosophy is to an amoeba.

Obvious statement is obvious, and poses no question or assertion, other than "God is complicated".
What am I supposed to say, sure?

Nonetheless, the video starts by humbly portraying god and his god as petty violent douches who grapple with the relatively simple concept of "things they don't know".

More air. A simplistic summery of the content injected with a mix of butt-hurt and condescension.

This of course is a concept for retarded meatbags like us.

Speak for yourself. Still no point to be found.

Nonetheless, after painfully labouring the point, we finally arrive at an actual (smug, wasted) human who claims to have created all the gods, but is painfully ignorant of the unknowable question of his own creator that we were forced to watch the idiotic gods deal with.

I can summarize this sentence with one word: Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
It is a summery with an expression of emotion. A description of how you feel about the perceived message.
There is no rational argument, point, or question anywhere in that mess.

The idea that you thought that was an acceptable way to start off a genuine conversation explains why you have such difficulty when dealing with others.
This is not how adults talk to each other.

[–] smallpond 0 points (+0|-0)

Well, look at you! Congratulations, I think that was an attempt to actually discuss the video! (in the sloppy, insulting manner of a sulking child who's been backed into a corner, but it's progress nonetheless). Just think of all of my time that you might not have wasted if your first comment was something like that above, but written by an emotional adult.

Let's walk you through the leadup to your first comment:

  I can't say I'm looking forward to picking this up again

From my first comment back after my deadline, feeling a little sorry for myself at the prospect of conversing with some random dude with mental problems on the internet. (By the way, damn I feel sorry for your family if you really have some.)

And yet, here you are, unable to walk away.

IB's childish reply.

I said I'd get back to you when I had more time, and I have.

Me reminding IB, assuming he'd remember my comment before the break, that I said I'd get back to him, and I merely have done what I said I would.

No. You said :

I can't say I'm looking forward to picking this up again

and I responded with "And yet, here you are, unable to walk away." And then, as you've done often, you used a strawman because you have no rebuttal.

So here's IB apparently getting randomly confused about what seems like a straightforward reply above, repeating his childish insult from earlier, and implying that it deserves some manner of rebuttal. The factual answer I gave was far more than it deserved.

Not a great memory on you. I said this:

I'll be happy to pick it up after this busy period passes, especially if you're feeling up to discussing the topic rather than playing internet bully.

So here's me reminding IB of my comment before the break, where I said that I would continue the conversation after my deadline.

That was not what I was responding to. You have no rebuttal to what I said, so you picked something I had not commented on. Derp.

Here's IB again... still seems to be confused. Still stating that his empty insult deserves rebuttal.

At this point I have far better things I should be doing, so I'll respond to the parts of the comment above that address the video tomorrow.

I get the impression that shrinks really don't need any qualifications at all, but do earn their living.

Me reminding IB, assuming he'd remember my comment before the break, that I said I'd get back to him, and I merely have done what I said I would.

Reminding me of a sentence I never replied to, in an attempt to distract from your stupidity. You saying you would return, has nothing to do with my comment.
The fact I pointed out is that you're not having fun, but are unable to control yourself enough to walk away. You're excuses are irrelevant.

But you did it again.
That's the same as your first comment.
It's just tears and butt-hurt. No rational or intelligent points anywhere to be found. Just a desperate and sad attempt to insult me.

Why does my opinion matter so much to you?
Why are you so obsessed with me that for more than a week all your interactions on this site have been centered around me. After being a frequent post/commenter until I triggered you.
I'm not sure if I should be flattered, or scared.

[–] smallpond 0 points (+0|-0) Edited

You're right, I replied after. That's why it has nothing to do with before.

That is truly moronic. See if you can think of some examples that show how moronic that is.

[–] smallpond 0 points (+0|-0)

No you never replied to my sentence before the break. If you were smarter, you would never have replied to what you did, because the sentence before the break makes your comment imbecilic.

You saying you would return, has nothing to do with my comment.

You put forward your sad little insult in reply to my first comment back. When a person who's not an asshole says they will do something, they generally do it even if it's unpleasant. Perhaps comprehension of that is asking too much of the warped thought processes that twist your world.

I'm still talking to you, because you're still trying to make sense inbetween the tantrums. Oh, and my work commitments have much more to do with my silence than you - but look, we're back to your psychic delusion again.