I didn't say that at all. What I do say is often of late, much of science is heavily biased ... possibly not intentionally, but none the same biased ... to political viewpoints. One group of scientists come to one conclusion ... a second comes to a polar opposite conclusion with the exact same data. I'm into this stuff ... as you can see by the things I post. My point is 'science' isn't a single entity. Scientists are as often as not incorrect in their studies ... again, as I said before, next month, next year, a totally different answer to a question will likely be put forth. There's nothing wrong with saying that settled science is most likely correct, i.e. the Earth is round or an airfoil provides lift ... however ... DNA is still a relatively new and developing science, and we still don't even know for certain how our moon came to be after eons of research, so I;m supposed to take a single study as gospel? That's not how science works, it is not a religion ... it is always evolving.
Yes thanks for explaining science for me.
You seem willing to throw the baby out with the bath water here because you don't like black people.
No, I'm suggesting I'm suspicious of anything that just 'happens' to reinforce an idea that would push an agenda that they desperately wish to push in the UK and Europe in general. Especially when I read scientific papers all the time and can't count the number of times one theory is overruled by something completely different with another study downstream.