Yes thanks for explaining science for me.
You seem willing to throw the baby out with the bath water here because you don't like black people.
Yes thanks for explaining science for me.
You seem willing to throw the baby out with the bath water here because you don't like black people.
LOL - way off bud. Don't accuse me of that. You can spend six weeks going through my Phuks or Voat submissions and never find any hater BS. I don't play that game. Again, all science is not settled, period. And much does play to politics ... it's how they're often funded. But since you've thrown out the tired old ... 'you're a racist' because I disagree with you epithet ... I'm disengaging from this now. No point going round and round.
LOL - way off bud. Don't accuse me of that. You can spend six weeks going through my Phuks or Voat submissions and never find any hater BS. I don't play that game. Again, all science is not settled, period. And much does play to politics ... it's how they're often funded. But since you've thrown out the tired old ... 'you're a racist' because I disagree with you epithet ... I'm disengaging from this now. No point going round and round.
I didn't say that at all. What I do say is often of late, much of science is heavily biased ... possibly not intentionally, but none the same biased ... to political viewpoints. One group of scientists come to one conclusion ... a second comes to a polar opposite conclusion with the exact same data. I'm into this stuff ... as you can see by the things I post. My point is 'science' isn't a single entity. Scientists are as often as not incorrect in their studies ... again, as I said before, next month, next year, a totally different answer to a question will likely be put forth. There's nothing wrong with saying that settled science is most likely correct, i.e. the Earth is round or an airfoil provides lift ... however ... DNA is still a relatively new and developing science, and we still don't even know for certain how our moon came to be after eons of research, so I;m supposed to take a single study as gospel? That's not how science works, it is not a religion ... it is always evolving.