IDK, too lazy to look. It's rasmussen though. They came the closest to the actual election results. I believe they had Hillary winning by like 1% which makes sense when you consider the popular vote.
IDK, too lazy to look. It's rasmussen though. They came the closest to the actual election results. I believe they had Hillary winning by like 1% which makes sense when you consider the popular vote.
They were the closest to predicting the election having Hillary win by 1% which accounts for the popular vote. Every other poll was ridiculously off. Are they "in favor" or simply the least biased and most accurate? People often forget other polls had given Hillary as high as a 92% chance of winning at points.
They were the closest to predicting the election having Hillary win by 1% which accounts for the popular vote. Every other poll was ridiculously off. Are they "in favor" or simply the least biased and most accurate? People often forget other polls had given Hillary as high as a 92% chance of winning at points.
Who was the demographic polled and how many votes were cast? I can't seem to find an answer to either.