They were the closest to predicting the election having Hillary win by 1% which accounts for the popular vote. Every other poll was ridiculously off. Are they "in favor" or simply the least biased and most accurate? People often forget other polls had given Hillary as high as a 92% chance of winning at points.
They were the closest to predicting the election having Hillary win by 1% which accounts for the popular vote. Every other poll was ridiculously off. Are they "in favor" or simply the least biased and most accurate? People often forget other polls had given Hillary as high as a 92% chance of winning at points.
Everyone is right once. The election result went the way it did due to low turnout of democrat voters, not because trump was wildly popular. They have consistently given him around 48-52%, amongst all Americans, not even just voters, which is bullshit.
Everyone is right once. The election result went the way it did due to low turnout of democrat voters, not because trump was wildly popular. They have consistently given him around 48-52%, amongst *all* Americans, not even just voters, which is bullshit.
IDK, too lazy to look. It's rasmussen though. They came the closest to the actual election results. I believe they had Hillary winning by like 1% which makes sense when you consider the popular vote.