He is using it to conduct business as president and therefore it is no longer just his personal account.
He is using it to conduct business as president and therefore it is no longer just his personal account.
using it to conduct business as president
Do you have an example?
no longer just his personal account.
By definition it is his personal account. If he is using it in the scope of his work, then that is the mistake.
Him being able to block people from his personal account is his right, no matter what his job.
> using it to conduct business as president
Do you have an example?
> no longer just his personal account.
By definition it is his personal account. If he is using it in the scope of his work, then that is the mistake.
Him being able to block people from his personal account is his right, no matter what his job.
From the linked article:
"uses the account to take actions that can be taken only by the President as President,” the judge said.
I agree that using his personal twitter account for governmental business was a bad idea, mostly because he now has to accept the limitations imposed on governments regarding transparency.
From the linked article:
"uses the account to take actions that can be taken only by the President as President,” the judge said.
I agree that using his personal twitter account for governmental business was a bad idea, mostly because he now has to accept the limitations imposed on governments regarding transparency.
I can't see this sticking.
That's not how free-speech works. Trump kicking people off his personal twitter is his right.
He is not preventing anyone from saying anything. They can say whatever they want on their twitter account, without repercussion from him.
It is not a 'Potus' account. It is Trumps account. He's still human, and still has rights too.
Regulating personal hours and actions is not something I will ever be ok with.