No one should be. Shifting the burden to hosts to censor content is the "socially acceptable" and "politically correct" way of removing censorship from the hands of the government.
Let's put it another way: if the government were doing this, few politicians would still be alive. But democrats with their PC culture have created a social expectation that causes most people to just accept it when a business does it.
Make no mistake at all, this was a long game and private institutions who exist beyond the protections of the Constitution, etc. as censors was the goal all along.
No one should be. Shifting the burden to hosts to censor content is the "socially acceptable" and "politically correct" way of removing censorship from the hands of the government.
Let's put it another way: if the government were doing this, few politicians would still be alive. But democrats with their PC culture have created a social expectation that causes most people to just accept it when a business does it.
Make no mistake at all, this was a long game and private institutions who exist beyond the protections of the Constitution, etc. as censors was the goal all along.
The problem with any of this, is Google cannot be trusted to make objective judgments.