7

7 comments

[–] Kannibal [OP] 1 points (+1|-0)

Creators have two months to clean up their acts. During this time, all dangerous challenge, prank videos and questionable thumbnails will be removed but their channels won't be penalized with a strike.

After the two-month grace period, any channel that receives three strikes in 90 days will be terminated. Channels who repeatedly use questionable thumbnails will first lose their custom thumbnail access and three strikes in 90 days will likewise terminate their accounts.

[–] [Deleted] 1 points (+1|-0)

The problem with any of this, is Google cannot be trusted to make objective judgments.

[–] ScorpioGlitch 2 points (+2|-0)

No one should be. Shifting the burden to hosts to censor content is the "socially acceptable" and "politically correct" way of removing censorship from the hands of the government.

Let's put it another way: if the government were doing this, few politicians would still be alive. But democrats with their PC culture have created a social expectation that causes most people to just accept it when a business does it.

Make no mistake at all, this was a long game and private institutions who exist beyond the protections of the Constitution, etc. as censors was the goal all along.

[–] KillBill 0 points (+0|-0)

All the blindfold scenes were ridiculously unbelievable and it's even more ridiculous that some morons bought it and think they could pull off the same shit.