Wrong. Someone you know has you in their address book and they share that with FB. They have a so called shadow profile of you.
Wrong. I was aware of shadow profiles before that was public. Nobody can add my name or address to their book if I don't have one to add.
Zuckerberg never got anything from me. I've been wearing my tinfoil hat from days before Zuckerberg had pubic hair.
Paranoia pays off when it turns out that everything is out to get us.
Agree 100% with the rest.
> Wrong. Someone you know has you in their address book and they share that with FB. They have a so called shadow profile of you.
Wrong. I was aware of shadow profiles before that was public. Nobody can add my name or address to their book if I don't have one to add.
Zuckerberg never got anything from me. I've been wearing my tinfoil hat from days before Zuckerberg had pubic hair.
Paranoia pays off when it turns out that everything is out to get us.
Agree 100% with the rest.
NOBODY CAN ADD MY NAME OR ADDRESS TO THEIR BOOK IF I DON'T HAVE ONE TO ADD.
Can you hear me now?
Obviously I'm not going into detail on this, so I'm not sure what kind of answer you're looking for. That statement is true in the context of the internet.
> NOBODY CAN ADD MY NAME OR ADDRESS TO THEIR BOOK IF I DON'T HAVE ONE TO ADD.
[Can you hear me now?](https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=OPwPo-IAQ-E)
Obviously I'm not going into detail on this, so I'm not sure what kind of answer you're looking for. That statement is true in the context of the internet.
Wrong. Someone you know has you in their address book and they share that with FB. They have a so called shadow profile of you.
And as long as they have the same business model, the overall situation will not improve.
The companies managed to make the users outcasts if they don't agree with sharing data. Those who had their contact data shared in someones contact list never agreed to any TOS though.
They didn't. They just used the APIs FB provided and then used that data.
I hope one will get up far and the other goes down.